Why does the mainstream industry only want a select few to be popular? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-21-2014, 12:20 AM   #191 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulflower View Post
Lol

I want to ask you this before I answer this question because I don't want to misinterpret your post.

Are you saying she is too talented and interesting for the casual music listener OR are you saying her music is not that good?
I'm saying she's clearly talented but it's like I said before if you want to appeal to the masses you have to dumb down.

Take Bowie for example, despite the whole Ziggy Stardust thing, the whole Berlin trilogy thing which was showered with critical acclaim and have come to be thought of as classic albums. You know what his most successful commercial period was?
It was the mid 80s when he was putting out terrible albums like Tonight & Never Let Me Down.

Like I said, you want to appeal to the masses you have to dumb down.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2014, 12:25 AM   #192 (permalink)
Fck Ths Thngs
 
DwnWthVwls's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,261
Default

Pop just means popular music. There is no particular sound or style that defines the genre.
__________________
I don't got a god complex, you got a simple god...

Quote:
Originally Posted by elphenor View Post
I'd vote for Trump
DwnWthVwls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2014, 12:25 AM   #193 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
I guess we just define what pop(ular) friendly music is differently then. If extremely popular songs weren't pop(ular) friendly, how would they get so popular?

I think we are defining the word differently.


I understand your definition and the way you define the terms does make sense. However, I am defining the term differently.

Based on my definition what makes a song pop friendly is how well it reflects current pop trends that is what makes it pop "friendly". It reflects the current pop music scene at the current time


It really has nothing to do with accessibility or how popular it becomes. There are plenty of popular songs that are not necessarily "pop friendly" (as in they don't reflect current pop radio trends)
Soulflower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2014, 12:26 AM   #194 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls View Post
Pop just means popular music. There is no particular sound or style that defines the genre.
I agree.
Soulflower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2014, 12:30 AM   #195 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulflower View Post
I think we are defining the word differently.


I understand your definition and the way you define the terms does make sense. However, I am defining the term differently.

Based on my definition what makes a song pop friendly is how well it reflects current pop trends that is what makes it pop "friendly". It reflects the current pop music scene at the current time


It really has nothing to do with accessibility or how popular it becomes. There are plenty of popular songs that are not necessarily "pop friendly" (as in they don't reflect current pop radio trends)
I see. How would you define something attempting to set trends? Is it only in hindsight that it's pop friendly?
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2014, 12:33 AM   #196 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hat€monger ? View Post
I'm saying she's clearly talented but it's like I said before if you want to appeal to the masses you have to dumb down.

Take Bowie for example, despite the whole Ziggy Stardust thing, the whole Berlin trilogy thing which was showered with critical acclaim and have come to be thought of as classic albums. You know what his most successful commercial period was?
It was the mid 80s when he was putting out terrible albums like Tonight & Never Let Me Down.

Like I said, you want to appeal to the masses you have to dumb down.
Okay I gotcha and I do agree

But in the previous decades, popular artists have made descent popular music with quality.....why is the industry not allowing it to happen now?

I think if they shoved Janelle Monae down our ears like they do Beyonce and Rihanna people would like her. They probably would not have to shove her as much because she actually makes interesting music.

It is almost like we are being forced to accept these mediocre artists and I just don't like that

Back in the day, we had more variety but we were not forced to like those pop stars.
Soulflower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2014, 12:34 AM   #197 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,548
Default

I would argue that we have a lot more variety these days due to the evolution of music coexisting with throwback-ism.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2014, 12:37 AM   #198 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
I would argue that we have a lot more variety these days due to the evolution of music coexisting with throwback-ism.
I agree...

I am mostly speaking in terms of the mainstream market.

The mainstream market is not that diverse.
Soulflower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2014, 12:37 AM   #199 (permalink)
Fck Ths Thngs
 
DwnWthVwls's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,261
Default

Janelle Monae is way more popular than most artists can ever dream of being. I think it's safe to say she has made it. I don't think radio play and popular music videos are the end all be all to defining success in the industry.
__________________
I don't got a god complex, you got a simple god...

Quote:
Originally Posted by elphenor View Post
I'd vote for Trump
DwnWthVwls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2014, 12:39 AM   #200 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
I see. How would you define something attempting to set trends? Is it only in hindsight that it's pop friendly?
I don't understand what you are trying to ask....


Are you asking me how would I define something that is trendy?
Soulflower is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.