![]() |
Trollheart Listens to Every Album on Wiki's List for 2017
Or tries to, anyway!
https://pm1.narvii.com/6635/5bb15c11...f215994_00.jpg THREAD IS NOW OFFICIALLY ABANDONED. THERE WILL BE NO MORE REVIEWS. HOPE SOME OF YOU ENJOYED AT LEAST SOME OF IT. THANKS. Being someone who generally tends to be lost when people start compiling AOTY lists at the end of the year, not often listening to albums from the current year, I thought maybe I'd try this. If I listen to every album released (as per Wiki) then I'll get a good flavour of, not what's cool or popular, about which I do not give a curse, but what good albums I might come across that I would otherwise have missed. Huge undertaking? Of course. Typical Trollheart attempt to kill himself by Review? You know it! However, as I'm sure you expect and understand, these albums won't be reviewed. At best I'll scribble a few lines about each, unless something really impresses me. I've nothing to prove with regard to writing reviews - those who have read my various journals, and some threads, know how good, or bad, I am at that, so this is more an attempt just to listen to the albums and quickly say what I think of each. I am, however, providing myself with three "get-out clauses": one is the "Oh Hell No!" clause, which will be implemented if I start an album and hate it right away. I'll try not to use that too often though; want to give everything a fair chance if I can. To that end, the "Three Strikes clause" is exactly what you would think it is: if, after three tracks, I'm not feeling it on a particular album, I retain the option to drop it and move on. After all, this is going to be a LOT of albums I have to listen to! Finally, if I get more than three tracks in to an album but it just isn't happening, I'm going to use the "Bailing Out!" clause. This is the most generous of the three, as it gives a higher allowance/tolerance for the album before I decide against it. If I use one of my clauses on an album you think I should give more of a chance, by all means let me know, but I'll retain the final say as to whether I go back and complete it or not. I'll be doing the albums chronologically and in alphabetical order, as per this list. Comments, advice, Nazi gifs etc all welcome. Note: I should make it clear I'm not going to bothering with any compilations such as the Now series, Ibiza Party or whatever the ****. No Best Of, Greatest Hits, boxsets or anthologies. No retrospectives, no special editions, no collector's editions. No re-releases of older albums or recordings of old concerts, whether previously released or not. Only proper, new albums. Yo. Further note: With so much to get through, it's either on Spotify or it's on YouTube in its entireity or it can **** off. I'm not going to be spending my time running around getting individual videos for each track off some album I may hate or not care about. One chance, then I move on. That's it. Tom Waits for no man. Some more notes: it should be understood that, naturally, every album only gets one chance to impress, so while some may be growers, if they don't speak to me first time they're done. I don't have the time to listen to albums more than once. This has even impacted on my participation in the two album clubs. So please don't tell me "Oh you should listen to it a few more times" or "Don't write it off after one listen." I've a lot to get through, and no time for passengers. This is an express service. :) Also, in an effort to stop people whining about my not using RYM (though I really don't care) I'll be adding, from now on (and hopefully retrospectively for the albums I've already looked at) the general RYM score, if it exists, for each album. Just for the comparison I guess. It will be interesting to see how many of the ones I feature here will actually turn up on RYM. One more note: In the genre/subgenre field I will be copying exactly what it says on the Wiki entry for the album, so if it's wrong don't blame me, though if it's obviously and glaringly wrong I will probably refer to it in the review. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_2017_albums Wish me luck! Note: from May forwards I'm going to include a reaction image at the start of the review ONLY in cases where I was very surprised by my reaction to an album, positive or negative. Good reactions that weren't expected will get this one http://www.trollheart.com/Homergs.jpg and ones where I thought the album would be great and it let me down will be denoted by https://media.giphy.com/media/xT5LML...Wlji/giphy.gif Why? Well it will give you a quick idea, if you don't fancy reading the whole thing or skipping to the rating, as to the impression the album made on me. Also, it's fun for me. I like fun. :) I'm only doing this from now on, as I have no intention of going back and checking all the albums I did for the last four months. But from this point on, if you see either image you'll know what to expect. Index As there's no way the entire index for the year would fit here in one post, what I've decided to do is put January's list here (and even at that, I've had to split it up), then as each month begins I'll leave a blank post for the index for that month, and link to it here. January Spoiler for January Index part one:
February February Index March March Index April April Index May May Index |
You should do this but go through the top RYM albums of the year instead of the wiki page.
|
Quote:
just a recommendation. but i think using RYM will give you a higher quality of releases vs wiki that will give you a lot of grade A garbage that quite frankly isn't worth reviewing. |
I wonder just how many grindcore and harsh noise albums came out this year?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://rateyourmusic.com/customchar...one&countries= |
Thanks but I'm gonna stick with Wiki. No matter what you think of them, it's an unbiased list, whereas RYM's is, one way or the other, the albums everyone seems to like, and so will be slanted in a certain direction, which as I said, I'm really not interested in. I'd rather wade through a pile of garbage and come across a few gems than be force-fed someone else's opinion. Thanks anyway.
|
That wiki list is very incomplete though.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://i.imgflip.com/hjv11.jpg |
I know a way to curb the bias while still using the quite expansive RYM chart.
Step one: decide whether to use the top, bottom, or esoteric 2017 lists. Step two: choose a number between 1 and 1000 through a random integer generator or something Step three: review the corresponding album on the list you chose. Repeat until you've reviewed 3000 albums. Then maybe you can start searching by subgenre. |
Almost nothing I've actually liked from this year is even on the Wiki list. At least the new Depeche Mode is there, if you ever make it that far.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Trollheart: I'm doing a thing and I decided to do it this way. Everyone else: Bro, it would be way better if you did it this way. Trollheart: Well I'm already on the mental wavelength of doing it the other way and it would be terrifying to do anything else at this point. Everyone else: wut |
¿Porque no los dos, TH?
Use RYM for the good releases that actually reflect modern music and use wiki for all the releases from the has beens and mainstream radio chart toppers. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
If anything I hope you use the charts as a resource in the future because the subgenres get really granular. The esoteric list type is good for genres that you already like, such as symphonic prog and adult contemporary or whatever you're into these days.
|
Well good luck with this, but I'll be impressed if you even make it past the first quarter if I'm honest.
Will you accept albums missing from the wikipedia list if you're made aware of them (keeping with the established chronological order ofc)? |
Quote:
|
Three a day? Jesus you're a masochist.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Proper lol'd out loud. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Three albums a day is a slow morning. Three reviews a day is bloodletting.
|
Quote:
Also: pussy. I used to do up to six reviews a day in my prime. :ar_15s: |
Yeah well you're a freak.
|
Quote:
|
(Moved to the OP)
|
JANUARY
Right then, let's get this thing kicked off, huh? As 2016 turned to 2017 a man for whom we all have the greatest respect released his twenty-sixth solo album, and as Wiki says it's first in line the first one I get to listen to, easing in nicely before all the **** hits my fan, is this: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...reflection.jpg Album title: Reflection Artist: Brian Eno Genre: Ambient, Instrumental Nationality: English Release date: January 1 Position in Discography: Twenty-sixth Familiar with this artist? Not as much as I probably should be Familiar with the genre or subgenre? Somewhat, but again see above Check out more from this artist? Definitely. Check out more from this genre or subgenre? Again, yes, for sure. Well this is all one long track, but that's ambient for you, so I'll just relax and let it wash over me, as I believe is the best course to take when listening to ambient albums. Okay, I already love this and we're only fifteen minutes into the just over an hour that the album - and track - run to. This is sweet. A really nice way to start off, no doubt preparing me for some of the crap I will have to endure. Relaxing. http://www.trollheart.com/speed10.jpg |
Can't wait for Trollheart's opinion on Wiley's album.
|
I'm looking forward to hear about Band-Maid and Mike Oldfield.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I've never even listened to an entire Chief Keef album cause the one was just too mindlessly dull.
|
Quote:
|
l m a o TH listening to Chief Keef is the funniest thing to happen on MB in quite awhile
he's ****e, but best of luck. lots of good hip-hop for you to listen to this year, grime too. Wiley, Diz, Milo, Brockhampton, Vince Staples, Bedwetter, Billy Woods, etc etc etc. doubt you'll like any of them but it will be fun to watch the suffering at the very least. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:14 PM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.