Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   The Lounge (https://www.musicbanter.com/lounge/)
-   -   The Official Religious/Political Debate Thread (https://www.musicbanter.com/lounge/19142-official-religious-political-debate-thread.html)

hookers with machineguns 01-10-2005 11:09 AM

^ It's probably legal in Texas to have a concealed weapon, I know it is in some states.

franscar 01-10-2005 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by covle
yes there should be a "no" in there somewhere. where that lives i leave to you. id suggest between "be" and "victory".
heres a crosscultural difference... what the hell is a limey?
by the way my dear, sufficient cricket team deprived friend, might i add that the world cricket team has at least 5 aussies in it out of 11 people? and its skippered by ponting too...

Ignoring the cricket, which after the third test is a wise, wise idea, a Limey is a term given to British sailors in ye olde days, when before setting sail for the green, green grass of home, part of the ships crew would be sent out to find as much lime as possible for the journey, for the vitamin C helped them to avoid scurvy. They became "affectionately" known as limeys.

SwitchFootRocks! 01-10-2005 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Jane
I dislike America because they often forget the rest of the world exists.


You cant blam all of america for that. i myself am very aware of other countries.

ArtistInTheAmbulance 01-10-2005 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SwitchFootRocks!
You cant blam all of america for that. i myself am very aware of other countries.

Noone can blame all of one country for anything I dont think... I know I havent thought that statement through well enough so someone is gonna come back in a bit and argue with that.. But this thread is just saying why you dont like the majority I guess? Or just the way its run mebbe.

IamAlejo 01-10-2005 01:17 PM

Quote:

I met a guy in summer from Texas who didn't know guns were illegal.
I have a hard time if you are gonna call this guy ignorant for this. While assault rifles are illegal, having a hunting rifle and such are not illegal. Sure you need a permit, but they are defenitely not illegal.

Quote:

I dislike America because they often forget the rest of the world exists.
I can't argue with this because it is so broad. Be more specific por favor.

IamAlejo 01-10-2005 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by covle
secondly while i see your point iamalejo, i do not agree. america donates money yes, and you should see what that money goes towards and have the right to withdraw your donations if it goes to an unjust means, such as another palace for the rulers or upgrading the tanks or something. but i do not believe that any nation has the right to interfere with anothers politics. "sticking your noses in it" so to speak. unless of course the obvious misuse of power conundrum card is in play. but would it not be easier to eliminate a percentage of the debt owed to your country by whoever your producing aid for rather than just build upon the interest and forcing them into further debt by giving them money?

I see what you mean...but with the money we pour into these economies, are you to say that the politics in that country do not effect the economy? I have a hard time believing that. A lot of money we use helps supporting other countries militaries. When we need help in a military event, we often ask for help from these countries. Etc, etc. While I don't think it is a "We did this for you, you are in eternal debt" deal, I do believe that a country with as large of a national debt as we have, the amount of aid we give out, we want/get something in return. The "giving aid to further them in debt" part I do not understand though. Most of the money we give out...is just that, "given out". While we ask for favors in return, we don't ask for the money in return with compounded interest.

Quote:

Originally Posted by covle
america was not founded on religious beliefs, mainly political and freedom reasons. one of my favourite quotes from the revolution was "patriarchial monarchy and hereditarial succession has lain the world in blood and ashes" by thomas paine, if memory serves.

I love Thomas Paine. Nice touch. On the not founded on religious beliefs, I think in a way it was. There are references from most American documents of that time dealing with God.

The Declaration of Indendence: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights"...."appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions"

I don't wanna talk about Vietnam.

Quote:

Originally Posted by covle
oh and i blame all you darn americans for the fat kid at the end of my street. obeisity began in america, existed solely in america and has been spread by mass corporations. the end. nothing else. there was no overweight people in any country except america. disagree? well you must be fat, or the fat guys got to you first. certainly not in australia, our beloved country, hey anti poptart chik?

So should the guy who invented cars be blamed for millions of car crashes each year? Should the man who invented missiles be blamed for the death of Iraqis. Obeisity is an issue of self control. I've never seen an American have McDonald's forced down his throat. Sure, advertising, blah blah blah...yes, it is conveniant. But anyone who eats properly, has self control, excercises, etc, can become a healthy person. I'm an American. I'm 6'4, 150 pounds. So send the fat jokes my way. And I hope the "no fat people in other countries" was an exaggeration trying to make your point.

Sweet Jane 01-10-2005 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IamAlejo

I can't argue with this because it is so broad. Be more specific por favor.

I was being specific, without trying to pick on anyone in particular, but my sentenes at the top of the page were all linked.

On the guns for instance, yes there are exceptions with hunting permits, but without going into rare circumstances the guy, who was over 21 years of age, did not know that even other American states were not allowed to have unregistered weapons in their homes, never mind the rest of the world. I just found that scary.

And the whole spirit of the thread is pretty broad, surely? I don't hate everything about America nor do I hate everyone in it.

IamAlejo 01-10-2005 03:52 PM

Acts like the rest of the world doesn't exist.

That's a broad ass statement. Like I don't think they help us? Like I don't believe in the map? That statement is not specific at all.

And no, you don't have to have a hunting permit to have a gun. That is incorrect. Guns can easily be purchased at your local wal-mart, given a month or so to do paperwork etc.

Sweet Jane 01-10-2005 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IamAlejo
Acts like the rest of the world doesn't exist.

Guns can easily be purchased at your local wal-mart, given a month or so to do paperwork etc.

Haha, thank you for proving my point.

IamAlejo 01-10-2005 05:18 PM

You are an idiot if you think you can't get a gun at wal-mart.

hookers with machineguns 01-10-2005 05:39 PM

Are we talking about the same country here?
I think in most states, you are allowed to have a concealed weapon, assuming you pass the state's background check (refer to Conceal- Carry laws in your state). And yes, they do sell hunting rifles and shotguns at Wal mart. Go to the nearest one to verify (please don't buy anything however, cause Walmart needs to go to hell). And yes, it is illegal to have unregistered guns. From what I'm reading, both of you are right, but where's the disagreeing point again? But yeah, the original statement "guns are illegal" is not true, because it is too broad.

Peter B 01-10-2005 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by franscar
Ignoring the cricket, which after the third test is a wise, wise idea, a Limey is a term given to British sailors in ye olde days, when before setting sail for the green, green grass of home, part of the ships crew would be sent out to find as much lime as possible for the journey, for the vitamin C helped them to avoid scurvy. They became "affectionately" known as limeys.

This is true. But in those days Lemons were called Limes (I dont know what they called Limes, maybe they hadn't come across them yet).

So really the English should now be known as Lemonys.

PS some people never eat an orange, lemon lime etc (or their juice) and wonder why they get colds, flu and even cancer in later life.
Take a tip from Captain Cook of the British Navy. Eat or juice a citrus fruit today !

Sweet Jane 01-10-2005 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IamAlejo
You are an idiot if you think you can't get a gun at wal-mart.

:rofl:

Jeez.. exactly what I said, Americans can be so ignorant of the rest of the world.

You're the idiot if you think I can walk into my local wal-mart and get a gun. If I went down there right now and started talking about guns, I'm pretty damn sure the police would be called and I'd probably be searched and/or taken away for questioning. And no, the police officers wouldn't have guns either.

There's a whole world exists outside America you know.

Sweet Jane 01-10-2005 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hookers with machineguns
And yes, they do sell hunting rifles and shotguns at Wal mart. Go to the nearest one to verify (please don't buy anything however, cause Walmart needs to go to hell). And yes, it is illegal to have unregistered guns. From what I'm reading, both of you are right, but where's the disagreeing point again? But yeah, the original statement "guns are illegal" is not true, because it is too broad.

Trust me, my nearest one doesn't... because it would not be legal to sell them like that. I know that's not the case in most of America. My point was simply that an American guy I met was completely unaware of the very tightly controlled gun laws, making them virtually illegal to carry or have around your home, outside America and in most countries worldwide, illustrating my point that America is somewhat ignorant to the rest of the world.

And please don't take my statement too literally.. I'm quite confident Americans are all familiar with maps. :)

IamAlejo 01-10-2005 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Jane
Trust me, my nearest one doesn't... because it would not be legal to sell them like that. I know that's now the case in America. My point was simply that an American guy I met was completely unaware of the very tightly controlled gun laws, making them virtually illegal to carry or have around your home, outside America and in most countries worldwide, illustrating my point that America is somewhat ignorant to the rest of the world.

And please don't take my statement too literally.. I'm quite confident Americans are all familiar with maps. :)

So if I said marijuana was illegal...then I am being an ignorant American, just because I'm not taking in mind the fact that Amsterdam and other countries have it legalized. That is an idiotic argument. But if you'd like, maybe I can give you a good ole test on American laws, and we'll see how well you do. I'm sure few are aware of specific laws outside of their countries.

anti_poptart_chik 01-11-2005 01:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IamAlejo
So if I said marijuana was illegal...then I am being an ignorant American, just because I'm not taking in mind the fact that Amsterdam and other countries have it legalized. That is an idiotic argument. But if you'd like, maybe I can give you a good ole test on American laws, and we'll see how well you do. I'm sure few are aware of specific laws outside of their countries.

I dont know about the rest of the world but Australian news shows so many images and stories about America that we couldn't be too far wrong.But for your example- "Amsterdam n their drug laws" its easy to be recognised as ignorant but you could easily show you are not by being specific if you had the knowledge. if not you are fairly ignorant.

Sweet Jane 01-11-2005 03:27 AM

^ Yeah I can totally see what you mean. Almost everyone is well aware of what goes on in America, its always on tv. Mind you I heard when that Tsnunami disaster occurred, CNN spent an hour, (It was at least that, i forget) at the start talking about all the American casualties, whereas every other European channel concentrated on the full story, and the destruction and loss caused to all nations. Anyway, thats another way to illustrate my initial broad statement, but to continue with the original...

Quote:

Originally Posted by IamAlejo
So if I said marijuana was illegal...then I am being an ignorant American, just because I'm not taking in mind the fact that Amsterdam and other countries have it legalized. That is an idiotic argument. But if you'd like, maybe I can give you a good ole test on American laws, and we'll see how well you do. I'm sure few are aware of specific laws outside of their countries.

Like anti poptark chik said, not many people would get much wrong in regards to main laws in other countries, capital punishement, drugs, weaponry, war, immigrant laws etc. Kids from 4 or 5 years of age recognise that America and many communist countries are different. We learn about this stuff. From a very young age, when we study politics, we learn about American politics, as we do a little about other large or neighbouring countries, not just our own. We learn about the American consitution. The majority of people are aware of laws outside their own countries, my point being many Americans seem to be the exception, again obviously not all of them. I live in Scotland, where we are allowed to smoke freely in bars etc, subject to non smoking sections and the occasional non smoking pub. This does not mean I am not aware that this is not the case in Ireland, just because we are allowed to do it.
Did you really not know that Wal-mart doesn't sell guns in most other countries?

And your point about marijuiana is unfair, because Amsterdam is in a very small minority in having it legalised, whereas it is illegal in most other parts of the world. That's what I'm trying to say, I think Americans should be aware of the bigger picture, about the state of affairs throughout the world. Not everyone can know every niche law in every other country, but to be a fully grown adult living in Amsterdam and not to realise marijuana is illegal pretty much everywhere else in the world would actually be pretty ignorant in my opinion. There's more to see than what goes on in your own back garden.

hookers with machineguns 01-11-2005 10:49 AM

I love it how if someone doesn't know one thing then all of a sudden he/she is ignorant. To me, admitting that you are wrong is something more powerful than intelligence.
Anywho, if I had known Sweet Jane was not from the US, that woulda initially made more sense. So I have to ask, what was your point in arguing about the Wal Mart thing again? Why would you disagree with Alejo, considering he lives in the US. We were on the subject of American Wal Marts btw, I thought that was obvious.
On the issue of marijuana, you might want to be careful how you address its status as "illegal" in certain places, because in fact, many places it is "decriminalized"- you should look into that.
I simply don't agree that Americans are any more "ignorant" (there's that word again) than the rest of the world. The average person knows just as much about his country's laws as he does any other country's laws. In real life situations, most people are not even fully aware of their rights. But, let's say that Americans don't know about other country's laws. Does it matter? If anything, we should focus on America's lack of understanding for other country's cultural, political, and historical backgrounds. Even then, does it matter? Without living here, do you think a foreigner can fully grasp the nature of America's culture through what they see through media? In other words, aren't we all just as bad, regardless of what country we happen to inhabit?

Molasses 01-11-2005 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IamAlejo
Amsterdam and other countries have it legalized.

Amsterdam is not a country! Wow you can really spot the American.

Sweet Jane 01-11-2005 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hookers with machineguns
I love it how if someone doesn't know one thing then all of a sudden he/she is ignorant. To me, admitting that you are wrong is something more powerful than intelligence.
So I have to ask, what was your point in arguing about the Wal Mart thing again? Why would you disagree with Alejo, considering he lives in the US. We were on the subject of American Wal Marts btw, I thought that was obvious.

On the issue of marijuana, you might want to be careful how you address its status as "illegal" in certain places, because in fact, many places it is "decriminalized"- you should look into that.

I simply don't agree that Americans are any more "ignorant" (there's that word again) than the rest of the world. The average person knows just as much about his country's laws as he does any other country's laws. In real life situations, most people are not even fully aware of their rights. But, let's say that Americans don't know about other country's laws. Does it matter? If anything, we should focus on America's lack of understanding for other country's cultural, political, and historical backgrounds. Even then, does it matter? Without living here, do you think a foreigner can fully grasp the nature of America's culture through what they see through media? In other words, aren't we all just as bad, regardless of what country we happen to inhabit?

I think it matters, if I only cared and learned about what was around me, I'd be pretty ignorant to other religions and cultures and many other things. But yeah, maybe it doesn't matter. I'm voicing my personal opinion here and no-one has to agree with it, but it matters to me. All the Americans I know feel the same way, I met many when I was travelling so I know I'm not completely alone here, and those guys all lived over there, so they must be able to grasp it fully, and they didn't have too much to say to defend much of what I agreed with. Something interesting I noticed was they only started to think this way when they moved to various European countries. And I'm not trying to attack americans, I think its the culture's fault, not anyone's own actings. I'd admit I was wrong if I thought I was I still think American culture can be, in comparison with the rest of the world. I'm not trying to look clever or anything, I could look up random laws and talk about them if I wanted to look intelligent just to prove a point, my point is, laws in other countries are widely taught and the main ones are general knowledge in most of Europe anyway.
And its not just one thing that makes a nation ignorant.. my orginal point about ignorance still stands wether about guns or not, I was using that as an example to illustrate my point as one of you asked me to, because my original statement was too broad to discuss.

No-one specifed that Alejo was talking about American wal-marts... he/she (sorry!) said 'if you think you can't get a gun from wal-mart you are an idiot.' Nothing about America was mentioned, and seeing as my orginal sentence was about meeting an American guy that didn't know guns were pretty much illegal in most of the world, I thought we were talking about the rest of the world.

And nothing wrong with using the term 'illegal' because 'decriminalised' does not mean it is legal, and you can still be fined and given a custodial sentence and a criminal record for having even small amounts of cannabis most places.
Adding 'de' to the world criminal doesn't mean its not criminal, anymore than 'demoted' means you've lost your job... it just means the positioning isn't as high up.

Okay I'll be quiet now unless someone has anything else to add to my points... I don't think we're going to agree on it, and I've said all I originally wanted to say, I don't want to argue with specific people over it.

IamAlejo 01-11-2005 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molasses
Amsterdam is not a country! Wow you can really spot the American.

Meant Amsterdam along with other countries...poorly worded.

IamAlejo 01-11-2005 01:14 PM

Quote:

I think it matters, if I only cared and learned about what was around me, I'd be pretty ignorant to other religions and cultures and many other things. But yeah, maybe it doesn't matter.
But when asked a question, wouldn't you first think it was in your own circumstances, your own situation, and not what is exactly "correct" for the rest of the world. What is around you is what you know best.

Quote:

No-one specifed that Alejo was talking about American wal-marts... he/she (sorry!) said 'if you think you can't get a gun from wal-mart you are an idiot.
He...and no need to be sorry, it's a message board, it can get difficult.

But from your original message, you stated that a Texan did not know guns were illegal. Think about that, the common person thinks that you are talking about guns being illegal around the Texan.

hookers with machineguns 01-11-2005 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Jane
And nothing wrong with using the term 'illegal' because 'decriminalised' does not mean it is legal, and you can still be fined and given a custodial sentence and a criminal record for having even small amounts of cannabis most places.
Adding 'de' to the world criminal doesn't mean its not criminal, anymore than 'demoted' means you've lost your job... it just means the positioning isn't as high up.

IN THE US, decriminalization of marijuana implies that you are NOT charged with a misdemeanor possession charge nor will it be included in your permanent record. Instead, you are given a ticket (you would more than likely pay the ticket the same courthouse you would go to for say a traffic ticket), the ticket would typically range anywhere between $25 to $300, depending on where you live. Still, in most locations in the states first offense charges are treated as misdemeanors and you could serve jail time and students can lose financial aid. "Legalization" implies that there are no tickets, no written punishments for possession. It might be a difference of opinion, but "decriminalization" to me has no criminal implication.

Fenixpunk 01-11-2005 01:43 PM

yeah thats right, decriminilization means exactly that, if found with substance on you then they give you a citation, which is far less than an actual criminal charge. You dont serve any jail time and it doesnt go on any criminal record. Here in Arizona it is still a Zero Tollerance State, in other words, even a seed can land you in jail with drug charges going on your criminal record. Most states that marijuana has been decriminalized in only allow up to a certain amount, usually an ounce or two, anything over that will still get you in trouble.

Molasses 01-11-2005 01:48 PM

A perfect travel size.

Fenixpunk 01-11-2005 01:50 PM

i agree, an ounce lasts me from one payday till the next, then its time to re-up again. But I try not to travel with it for obvious reasons..aka Sherriff Joe Arpaio

hookers with machineguns 01-11-2005 01:50 PM

My state has not decriminalized marijuana, but my city has, and the max charge for the first offense is $250 including court costs. Im not sure if this is the national figure, but I think they draw the line at 35 grams (ounce & quarter).

Fenixpunk 01-11-2005 01:53 PM

250 bucks is alot of cash, but it beats a week in tent city anyday

Greg 01-11-2005 04:19 PM

How often do you get paid? That much a month and I'd never get to work!

riseagainstrocks 01-11-2005 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jibber
I worded my post in the way that I did because it sounded as though you were denouncing the fact that US troops killed innocent people in the Vietnam and Korean war as a false statement.


Oh no. I know some did. People go crazy. I misunderstood.

riseagainstrocks 01-11-2005 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by covle
to start off, america was not founded on religious beliefs, mainly political and freedom reasons. one of my favourite quotes from the revolution was "patriarchial monarchy and hereditarial succession has lain the world in blood and ashes" by thomas paine, if memory serves.
secondly while i see your point iamalejo, i do not agree. america donates money yes, and you should see what that money goes towards and have the right to withdraw your donations if it goes to an unjust means, such as another palace for the rulers or upgrading the tanks or something. but i do not believe that any nation has the right to interfere with anothers politics. "sticking your noses in it" so to speak. unless of course the obvious misuse of power conundrum card is in play. but would it not be easier to eliminate a percentage of the debt owed to your country by whoever your producing aid for rather than just build upon the interest and forcing them into further debt by giving them money?
do not fault yourself to think that the us was the gardian angel or saviour in the vietnam war riseagainstrocks. no good came out of that war. nothing good could. only death. and millions of innocent deaths taken by both sides. for example mylai.
and the hitler comment was just plain ludicrious to me. hitler came to power by freakish circumstances. the main being the sever depression following germany's crushing defeat in ww1 and the psychological loses from this only for starters. in desperate times only the hard suvive. this includes ideals and forums in my mind. the nazis started as less than than 1% of the voting population. it started in a local tavern where hitler began speaking to old drunkards. but im sure everyone knows that story.
the communism vs capitalism war was mentioned again. something as petty as differing political beliefs should never cost millions of lives.
the end of ww2 was an excellent thing of course. the means that brought about it itself is horrendous. but i guess the two a-bombs outweighed the chance of succumbing to the germans and japanese and the damage to western society.
and when reading artistintheambulances post...i strongly disagree my friend. no, everyone is never going to be equal, but isnt it something to stride for? even if race is overlooked eventually, there will always be something to disern an elitist group. you say someones got to take the lead? why does it have to be one nation? ever heard of the kentian theory? if not ill explain. there is no nationality just a global identity. the world is run by a body such as the u.n except this organisation consists of all nationalities and religions no matter the size or wealth. the body actually has power by an appointed force contributed to by all nations. therefore any nation decides to go against the will of the organisation actually has something to face, not just a board of old men. i know this is a utopian society and it will never happen but it is a good dream.
oh and i blame all you darn americans for the fat kid at the end of my street. obeisity began in america, existed solely in america and has been spread by mass corporations. the end. nothing else. there was no overweight people in any country except america. disagree? well you must be fat, or the fat guys got to you first. certainly not in australia, our beloved country, hey anti poptart chik?


America was not founded on religious beliefs but rather greatly influenced by them. Patrick Henry, Benjamin Franklin, George Washington and many others where devout Christians.

I never said the Vietnam War was a good thing. I was saying it could have been a lot worse had something not been done about it.

Your idea of the National Socialist Party is quite wrong. the Nazi party was not begun by Hitler, was disbanded by the government twice and captured almost a third of the German parlement in its first standing election. Hitler if anything was depressed because of his mother's death and his percieved cowardice of the German generals during WWI. The comment was not ludicris because situations like exist all over Africa and Asia.

Dreams never solved anything. Don't put so much faith in Utopia. Work to make things better now instead of complaining.

I seriously hope you were joking about the fat kid comment. While America does have the highest obesity rate in the world, we also have a much higher poulation that Australia and almost all the European counties.

riseagainstrocks 01-11-2005 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hookers with machineguns
See, when you got a guy like GWB as your figurehead, his message globally should be taken with a grain of salt. His cowboy limericks like "evildoers" and "freedom this, freedom that" makes the average american look like a guntoting redneck. My favorite thing GWB has ever said is that terrorists hate america because of our freedom. Right, like any human being would hate freedom. Hmm you think GWB, maybe it's because we are forcefeeding them democracy, christianity, and Starbucks down their throats.


People hate freedom because it removes them from a position of power. If the Middle East had fee elections, do you think that they would elect Saddam Huissen? Osama Bin Laden? Some might vote for them yes. We have people voting for Lyndon LaRouge in this country. But the overwhelming majority would not vote for them. We take free speech and press and religion for granted...kinda sad.

IamAlejo 01-11-2005 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by riseagainstrocks
I seriously hope you were joking about the fat kid comment. While America does have the highest obesity rate in the world, we also have a much higher poulation that Australia and almost all the European counties.

Obesity rate has nothing to do with the total population.

anti_poptart_chik 01-11-2005 10:59 PM

[QUOTE=IamAlejo]But when asked a question, wouldn't you first think it was in your own circumstances, your own situation, and not what is exactly "correct" for the rest of the world. What is around you is what you know best.


I half agree wit ur comment but in todays society we are so multicultural that we have to accept and recognise other peoples cultures also with business being done on such a global level we cant be oblivious to other countries laws and practices.

jibber 01-11-2005 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by riseagainstrocks
I seriously hope you were joking about the fat kid comment. While America does have the highest obesity rate in the world, we also have a much higher poulation that Australia and almost all the European counties.

Yeah america does have a higher population than Australia and all the European countries, but that has nothing to do with the situation. America has the highest PERCENTAGE of obese people in the world, which put more simply, makes America the fattest nation on the earth.

covle 01-12-2005 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IamAlejo


So should the guy who invented cars be blamed for millions of car crashes each year? Should the man who invented missiles be blamed for the death of Iraqis. Obeisity is an issue of self control. I've never seen an American have McDonald's forced down his throat. Sure, advertising, blah blah blah...yes, it is conveniant. But anyone who eats properly, has self control, excercises, etc, can become a healthy person. I'm an American. I'm 6'4, 150 pounds. So send the fat jokes my way. And I hope the "no fat people in other countries" was an exaggeration trying to make your point.


sarcasm my good man. i am saying something like obeseity cannot be blamed on one country or even dorporations. our lifestyle in the western world has become so easy that for entertainment kids dont have to do anything. they can sit and play videogames or any ****. we are becoming fat because ourlives are so easy. everything is done for us. i am not so stupid as to even attempt to blame anyone for such problems.

covle 01-12-2005 09:00 AM

[QUOTE=riseagainstrocks]
I never said the Vietnam War was a good thing. I was saying it could have been a lot worse had something not been done about it.

what did america do about it? they didnt end it. america lsot the war and left. im not having a go at america but they did nothing for it.

Your idea of the National Socialist Party is quite wrong. the Nazi party was not begun by Hitler, was disbanded by the government twice and captured almost a third of the German parlement in its first standing election. Hitler if anything was depressed because of his mother's death and his percieved cowardice of the German generals during WWI. The comment was not ludicris because situations like exist all over Africa and Asia.

you misunderstand. i meant hitlers involvement in the nazi party. ill put that down to late nights, many coffees on my part.

Dreams never solved anything. Don't put so much faith in Utopia. Work to make things better now instead of complaining.

i was not complaining. i was putting forth what i believe we should work for. as i said, it would never happen, but it is something worth working towards, which is exactly what you just said. so i guess we agree on this.

covle 01-12-2005 09:11 AM

[QUOTE=IamAlejo]I see what you mean...but with the money we pour into these economies, are you to say that the politics in that country do not effect the economy? I have a hard time believing that. A lot of money we use helps supporting other countries militaries. When we need help in a military event, we often ask for help from these countries. Etc, etc. While I don't think it is a "We did this for you, you are in eternal debt" deal, I do believe that a country with as large of a national debt as we have, the amount of aid we give out, we want/get something in return. The "giving aid to further them in debt" part I do not understand though. Most of the money we give out...is just that, "given out". While we ask for favors in return, we don't ask for the money in return with compounded interest.


much of what is labelled "aid" is actually a loan. these loans are given out by numerous countries, not only america, that have a more negative effect on the country. on face value, sure it looks like an extremely humane gesture and the countries media will eat that up. but the interest on such loans is so high that if used as intended, the country would attempt to build humanitarian services for their citizens, they would have no chance of repaying the debt. and as time rolls on, as inevitably it does-or so im told, the interest gets larger and larger and the countries best chance to look after its people is initially to eliminate the debt so they can start from square one, build up their economy and such and then look to improve the citizens way of life. so while most countries look only at the immediate future with the money, it has an intense deprative effect moreso than positive. i am not talking about aid given in times of dier need such as in the tsunami effected areas, so nobody bother bringing that up. many 3rd world countries are in this situation, and many from loans after ww1 and 2.

also, my apologies for multiple successive posts. i kept finding other points to write about.

IamAlejo 01-12-2005 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by covle
much of what is labelled "aid" is actually a loan. these loans are given out by numerous countries, not only america, that have a more negative effect on the country. on face value, sure it looks like an extremely humane gesture and the countries media will eat that up. but the interest on such loans is so high that if used as intended, the country would attempt to build humanitarian services for their citizens, they would have no chance of repaying the debt.

I'd love to see the numbers on our total money given out in these "loans" and the total paid back in these "loans". I find it hard to believe we get paid back half of what we give out, and with all that interest we should be making much much more.

riseagainstrocks 01-12-2005 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IamAlejo
Obesity rate has nothing to do with the total population.

I know, I'm saying even though our rate is high, our total population is overall slim. however by a slim margin.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:32 PM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.