The Sexual Experience Thread

[FRED HALE SR.]

Originally Posted by Salami

Sir, I thought booty excited you more than personality, but the wording of this appears to insinuate that your desire for booty is conditional to the independence of the woman.

Completely agreed, it irritates me no end how superficially attractive people who are completely shallow seem to draw everyone else.
I've got a bit of a rule for any relationship I am in - anyone who I even allow myself to be interested in has got to be more intelligent than myself. And by this I don't mean exam wise, or what university they are aiming for. It has to be a person who has in all ways a greater mind than myself - because I want to look up to them. I hate relationships where anyone is treated as property or an accessory. I can't stand people who say "yo check out ma bitch's ass!". Because although it can be slightly funny, it's treating a person as an object.

Anyway rant over - to me this is even more important than GENDER, I'll enjoy sex only if the other person has something I really respect, that's what makes it a real experience.

Yeah I use to be this way, until I started dating a girl with a great ass.

[Burning Down]

Originally Posted by Franco Pepe Kalle

Some good reasons
1) I will pay attention to her
2) I will let her have a break sometimes.
3) I am a nice guy
4) I allow disagreement sometimes.

#2 & #4 - you want to control her? What?

Hey Salami, would you identify as pansexual?

[Salami]

And sorry mate but....

Originally Posted by Franco Pepe Kalle

Some good reasons
1) I will pay attention to her
2) I will let her have a break sometimes.
3) I am a nice guy
4) I allow disagreement sometimes.

"I will let her have a break sometimes" - really does sound like a Victorian factory owner discussing how he will treat his workers, as if the occasional relinquishing of demands are actually a demonstration of astonishing liberty and humanitarianism, in fact something to single you out from everyone else.

Do you think that makes you someone special she will love?

Also ominous is "I allow disagreement sometimes..." as if there is even a limit to how far she is allowed to think for herself.

[Urban Hat€monger ?]

Originally Posted by Franco Pepe Kalle

You think I hate women or something.

No, I think they'd be best steering well clear of you.

[Burning Down]

Hey Franco, I have a question since you're such an expert on asses - can a man have a nice ass too?

[Salami]

Originally Posted by Burning Down

#2 & #4 - you want to control her? What?

Hey Salami, would you identify as pansexual?

I'm scared of the term because of the stigma attached after Ducey used it!
No doubt the fact that I'm still young and confused accounts for a lot of the "retarded sexuality" I'm feeling (in the eloquent words of a rather bigoted critic). On the one hand I really don't think I can ever have a relationship with a guy, for reasons I've written down somewhere then forgotten, but on the other hand the best "relationship" I've ever had was with a guy, or certainly the most fun.
With any luck as soon as I grow up I'll sort myself out. I'm not even going to call myself "bisexual".

[Franco Pepe Kalle]

Originally Posted by Burning Down

Hey Franco, I have a question since you're such an expert on asses - can a man have a nice ass too?

Of course but I don't judge. I let the females judge. Some females have wanted to squeeze my ass once. I remember back in high school and I was laying down, a woman told me that I had a nice ass. I was like thanks.

[Franco Pepe Kalle]

Originally Posted by Burning Down

#2 & #4 - you want to control her? What?

Why would I want to control her. What is the point of that. I meant sometimes that I will cook and the laundry but other times she will do the cooking and laundry.

Sometimes I will allow my woman to argue with on me on issues of life but when it comes to the bills, usually I will make that decision.

[Urban Hat€monger ?]

He's trolling now

Right?

[Salami]

Originally Posted by Franco Pepe Kalle

Why would I want to control her. What is the point of that. I meant sometimes that I will cook and the laundry but other times she will do the cooking and laundry.

I'm a bit confused - you said earlier that you wanted someone who would be independent or "her own woman", yet you seem to have arranged her roles in the relationship already. Or do you mean "be her own woman" in a way that does not encompass a woman's right to object to conforming to the traditional "woman doing the housework" idea of a relationship?

Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger ?

He's trolling now

Right?

Well sir, although if genuine then it is very depressing, but I'm sure there are plenty of people who would agree with him.