Maybe I pulled it off too son.

Also obviously I was making a funny face for the sake of the selfie

I’m a sexy mofo no matter what you think

If you say so. I can’t say for sure until we make love.

If you have to say it...

:clap:

**** that. Bitches need to get abortions. I said it. I meant it. I’m here to represent it.

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/eedQkVIIT28/hqdefault.jpg

:clap:

whether they want em or not

Word up. It ain’t bout what they want. It’s about what I want. And I want their legs spread and a vacuum hose sucking a fetus from their vagina. Get that look on their face like ew I’m getting unf ucked by Hoover

Grunt

Fetus Sucking

Decent band name

Tell Thirlwell

lmao @ getting un****ed by Hoover

At the very least, like Chappelle said, if they can kill them we should able to abandon them.

I've thought about the solution to this before. I would propose the idea of an abortion contract. If you get a girl to sign said contract, and she gets pregnant and has the kid anyway, she's on her own as far as raising it.

Similar to how in a prenupt, you can sign a contract that strips you of the rights and entitlements a spouse typically inherits in a divorce, the abortion contract is a voluntary agreement whereby you agree to get an abortion.

If you get knocked up and if you reneg on that and have the kid anyways you thereby relinquish the man from any legal responsibility to care for the kid or pay child support.

Or you can pay your ****ing child support so the kid doesn't have to eat ramen while you pat yourself on the back for going your own way.

I mean yea that's a nicer thing to do

You can also donate your money to charity

But you don't have to

If you and the girl agree on the contract and she doesn't honor it that's basically her fault

That's a psychopathic contract. If you have a kid and don't want to contribute to them then I don't think you should be rewarded. I think you should be shot in the head. That kid is also your fault cause you were having fun playing around with mating and no contract can change that.

This is like an advanced level of dumbass mansplaining. It’s so dumb there isn’t even a term for it

Not really. There's an obvious way to avoid the kid: an abortion.

Women have the say there because it's their body. Yet it's not psychopathic for them to kill the kid even if the man doesn't agree with it, simply cause that's not the direction she wants her life to go.

So there's nothing psychotic about a contract which is completely voluntary on both parties where they agree on the action to be taken in case of a pregnancy. If the woman or the man dont want to enter in said contract they don't have to. And if the contract says abort and the woman enters into it and changes her mind, that's fine too. She just assumes full responsibility for the kid since she single handedly decided to bring it into existence. There's nothing immoral about it.

Only an idiot man would come up with a “solution” that only benefits the man, has zero benefit for the woman, and therefore no woman on earth would ever agree to it for any reason

The prenupt is largely the same sorta thing in most regards.

Yet it exists and many women agree to it.

If nobody agrees to it, then it poses no threat either way. So there's no argument against making it an option. Only an idiot would fail to see that.

I get that you're a robot who doesn't understand these things and so you're just concerned with the thing that helps your side but if I found out that my deadbeat dad not only left me when I was two, but had a contract that gave him the legal right to do so, it would be completely degrading and dehumanizing. I'd think that any man worth speaking of would tear up the contract and pay his child support no matter how mad he was at the mother. So I can only deduce that the only people who would benefit from such a contract would be psychopaths and pathetic man-children.

ITT Women are weak and need to be protected

It's not about some hateful battle between you and women. It's about the kid. ITT you are a moron.

basically

I mean you can decide to do the right thing but if she tricked you into having the kids you shouldn't be forced to

It just like if a woman gets artificially inseminated and then hits up the sperm donor for child support

Same kid that she can suck out of her sinkhole with impunity

**** it

If a woman sits on a toilet seat and gets pregnant should she be able to leave the kid in the middle of the street? It's not about you. Stop being a whiny bitch.

Child support is unregulated bs that doesnt guarantee the child actually gets supported by the money.. pretty sad.

Yeah see this isn't about what you should or shouldn't have to do, this is about you feeling emasculated at the thought of a woman having power over you. What a ****ing slimeball.

Yeh.. she can abort it or just give it up for adoption

nah I just think this would be more fair

For the same reason prenupts exist.. you should be at least able to try to avoid the scenario where you're forced to pay. If it's voluntary then it will only be relevant if she agrees to it. She has exactly the aiming of power she deserves, in that scenario.

Nah I mean should she be able to just abandon it cause maybe she just decided she doesn't want the kid and doesn't care enough to bother with adoption.

What, you don't know how true it is that a woman can get an abortion or abandon the kid? Really?

And I dunno what you mean by regulation.

If youre talking to me, I think they should have to provide evidence in the form of receipts or something showing that the money is being spent to actually support the child its for.. I know it's anecdotal but I know a good amount of people whose exs use the money for bs like most anyone with free money would do.

If you cared about fair you wouldn't design a contract to screw over the kid. You just want to give women the finger and get attention on the internet.

that would be some form of child neglect since she's going to leave it without an adult to supervise it. Which isn't the same.

Plus.. " I can't be bothered with adoption" is a very lazy and petty complaint. Compared I don't want to pay for a kid for 18 years after we specifically agreed not to have one.

I was just throwing it out there, the main point is that I feel its currently not monitored closely enough. I dont have the answers.

the contract isn't designed to screw the kid, but to give men a bit more reproductive control than they have.

It literally is designed to screw the kid by denying them support. Are you really that dumb?

Fa...

Nah.

That's like saying that abortion is designed to kill the kid, or adoption is designed to strip them of their birth parents

These are options given to people so that they can better exercise control of their own lives, which necessarily have some negative impact on the kid.

You keep harping on as if the man in this contract is the one harming the child. I would say it's arguably the woman who has the kid after explicitly agreeing not to.

Yes that is the case.

Which is why we weigh both sides of the equation. We abort fetuses up to a certain point but not after. We allow men the opportunity to wear condoms or get snipped but not to abandon their children.

Two things can be true at the same time. Stop being a whiny bitch.

it's not abandoning if they specifically agree not to have them. It's similar to a woman suing her sperm donor for child support.



stop letting your daddy issues blind you