Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Media (https://www.musicbanter.com/media/)
-   -   What's The Latest Film You Have Seen? (https://www.musicbanter.com/media/26687-whats-latest-film-you-have-seen.html)

Justthefacts 09-08-2016 01:17 AM

If anyone's interested in Paddy Considine, I strongly recommend this shit. Chula I think you'd like this movie. I advocate not reading the description first and just press play.

https://s9.postimg.org/k5mcxz3mn/image.jpg

Watch Dead Man's Shoes Online Free Putlocker | Putlocker - Watch Movies Online Free

bob. 09-10-2016 10:57 AM

^love this film!!!!!!

JGuy Grungeman 09-10-2016 11:34 AM

Saving Private Ryan. Wow.

bob. 09-10-2016 11:49 AM

Sausage Party does an amazing job of re making that opening scene

JGuy Grungeman 09-10-2016 06:55 PM

Psycho. Hitchcock had a uniqe form of suspence.

Thelonious Monkey 09-10-2016 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djchameleon (Post 1741873)
Nah screw you the fight was great. It was good to finally see them going at it and then the Wonder Woman intro was worth the price of admission alone. Downplay it all you want but the fight was awesome.

The fight was yawnsome.

The Batlord 09-10-2016 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Violet_ (Post 1742935)
The fight was yawnsome.

^

djchameleon 09-10-2016 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Violet_ (Post 1742935)
The fight was yawnsome.

Whatever. You are just a DC hater.

The Batlord 09-11-2016 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djchameleon (Post 1742989)
Whatever. You are just a DC hater.

Two to one, that's definitive. BvS fight was bogus.

MicShazam 09-11-2016 09:10 AM

Man on the Moon yesterday, Taken today.

Both are allright movies, but don't blow me away.
Jim Carrey overacts annoyingly hard in Man on the Moon, and Taken would have been more fun if it didn't take itself so seriously. It's too dumb to have earned it's semi realistic style.

Thelonious Monkey 09-11-2016 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djchameleon (Post 1742989)
Whatever. You are just a DC hater.

I can't quite understand how people can defend the DC movie universe with the **** they've put out so far. There are various moments that shine, but man they suck as a whole.

JGuy Grungeman 09-11-2016 10:33 AM

I wouldn't mind if they just rebooted it now.

djchameleon 09-11-2016 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Violet_ (Post 1743038)
I can't quite understand how people can defend the DC movie universe with the **** they've put out so far. There are various moments that shine, but man they suck as a whole.

I agree with you but one of those shining moments was the damn fight scene in BvS everything else building up to it was super boring.

Chula Vista 09-11-2016 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MicShazam (Post 1743028)
Man on the Moon yesterday, Taken today.

Both are allright movies, but don't blow me away.
Jim Carrey overacts annoyingly hard in Man on the Moon, and Taken would have been more fun if it didn't take itself so seriously. It's too dumb to have earned it's semi realistic style.

Ebert's review of Taken is so spot on. (I love that movie BTW)

Quote:

If CIA agents in general were as skilled as Bryan Mills in particular, Osama bin Laden would have been an American prisoner since late September 2001. "Taken" shows Mills as a one-man rescue squad, a master of every skill, a laser-eyed, sharpshooting, pursuit-driving, pocket-picking, impersonating, knife-fighting, torturing, karate-fighting killing machine who can cleverly turn over a petrol tank with one pass in his car and strategically ignite it with another.

Now listen to this. Using CIA contacts at Langley, Mills is able to use his garbled tape of their conversation to determine the name of his girl's kidnapper (Marko), that he is Albanian, that his ring kidnaps young tourists, drugs them and runs them as prostitutes; the virgins are auctioned off to Arab sheiks and so on. Headquarters also tells Mills he has 96 hours to rescue his daughter before she meets a fate worse than death, followed by death.

With this kind of intelligence, the CIA could be using bin Laden's Visa card in every ATM in Virginia. It's the set-up for a completely unbelievable action picture where Mills is given the opportunity to use one element of CIA spycraft after another, read his enemies' minds, eavesdrop on their telephones, spy on their meetings and, when necessary, defeat roomfuls of them in armed combat.

MicShazam 09-11-2016 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chula Vista (Post 1743052)
Ebert's review of Taken is so spot on. (I love that movie BTW)

I thought the movie was quite entertaining too much of the way, but I kept thinking that it would work better if it had feld more like a mid 80's Arnold movie. It is too gritty and the bad guys are not twirling their mustaches enough. In fact, there isn't even a real main villain. He kills every badguy within 5 minutes of introduction. He's just too effective! :P

JGuy Grungeman 09-11-2016 02:17 PM

After Hitchcock's Psycho, I'm on a 50's-60's thriller buzz. So I'm watching North by Northwest.

Janszoon 09-11-2016 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JGuy Grungeman (Post 1743099)
After Hitchcock's Psycho, I'm on a 50's-60's thriller buzz. So I'm watching North by Northwest.

North By Northwest is great. And the final shot is hilarious.

bob. 09-11-2016 06:28 PM

it certainly got the point across :)

JGuy Grungeman 09-11-2016 07:55 PM

I'm finishing it now. Also just watched Following. What a twist.

Exo 09-11-2016 08:11 PM

I saw Don't Breathe the other day. It was very tense. Had some stupid moments but I really enjoy these "BE VERY TENSE THE WHOLE TIME" flicks that have been coming out recently like Green Room. I liked it a lot.

Ol’ Qwerty Bastard 09-11-2016 08:22 PM

Yeah, I also really enjoyed Dont Breathe. The first few minutes had me convinced that I was going to hate it, but they won me back pretty quickly once the movie got going.

JGuy Grungeman 09-11-2016 09:35 PM

That was me with Night of the Living Dead.

JGuy Grungeman 09-12-2016 11:56 AM

I started The Seven Year Itch yesterday. So far, I like it more than Some Like It Hot.

Janszoon 09-12-2016 12:16 PM

Some Like It Hot is pretty bad.

duga 09-12-2016 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon (Post 1743368)
Some Like It Hot is pretty bad.

So is The Seven Year Itch. They lightened up the story for the big screen since it was made in the 50's. The original play was a lot raunchier.

I've been on an 80's kick myself. I recently rediscovered Buckaroo Bonzai Across the 8th Dimension - man, they don't make movies like that anymore.

JGuy Grungeman 09-12-2016 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon (Post 1743368)
Some Like It Hot is pretty bad.

You need a lobotomy.

The Batlord 09-12-2016 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JGuy Grungeman (Post 1743423)
You need a lobotomy.

Nah, it's boring. Maybe the idea was fresh at the time, but cross dressing humor has been done so many times since in movies that it's no longer particularly funny, and Marilyn puts on her best dumb blonde impression that has not aged well at all. Just because a movie was funny in the 50s doesn't mean we're obligated to find it funny decades after it was actually relevant.

JGuy Grungeman 09-12-2016 03:55 PM

Maybe not, but I don't think it's fair to compare a movie's humor to things that copied it years after its release. Besides, it was my first Marilyn Monroe movie, and my second Tony Curtis movie. It was pretty hilarious seeing a Spartacus actor cross dress since he was so serious in Spartacus.

The Batlord 09-12-2016 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JGuy Grungeman (Post 1743429)
Maybe not, but I don't think it's fair to compare a movie's humor to things that copied it years after its release. Besides, it was my first Marilyn Monroe movie, and my second Tony Curtis movie. It was pretty hilarious seeing a Spartacus actor cross dress since he was so serious in Spartacus.

Of course it's fair. If there's one genre on Earth that can be judged in hindsight, it's comedy. If you've seen it before it's probably not going to be as funny as the first time, and since everything about Some Like It Hot is now old hat, it is now unfunny. However good it might have been back in the day is irrelevant.

Janszoon 09-12-2016 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1743428)
Nah, it's boring. Maybe the idea was fresh at the time, but cross dressing humor has been done so many times since in movies that it's no longer particularly funny, and Marilyn puts on her best dumb blonde impression that has not aged well at all. Just because a movie was funny in the 50s doesn't mean we're obligated to find it funny decades after it was actually relevant.

I don't think cross dressing humor was any fresher in 50s. I mean Shakespeare was playing it for laughs 400 years before that. But regardless, yeah, I didn't laugh a single time when saw Some Like it Hot—and I saw it under great circumstances at an event hosted by Roger Ebert. Still, no laughs. The only humor I remember from that movie that wasn't threadbare cross dressing humor was them making fun of 1920s fashions—talk about jokes that haven't aged well.

The Batlord 09-12-2016 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon (Post 1743432)
I don't think cross dressing humor was any fresher in 50s. I mean Shakespeare was playing it for laughs 400 years before that. But regardless, yeah, I didn't laugh a single time when saw Some Like it Hot—and I saw it under great circumstances at an event hosted by Roger Ebert. Still, no laughs. The only humor I remember from that movie that wasn't threadbare cross dressing humor was them making fun of 1920s fashions—talk about jokes that haven't aged well.

Was anyone else laughing?

Janszoon 09-12-2016 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1743435)
Was anyone else laughing?

I don't remember actually. I don't think any of the people I was with were laughing.

The Batlord 09-12-2016 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon (Post 1743439)
I don't remember actually. I don't think any of the people I was with were laughing.

That movie is to "Best of" comedies lists what Sgt. Pepper is to Rolling Stone lists: always at the top, and most likely because of fogey critic nostalgia, mindless elitism, and just being too scared to challenge convention.

Janszoon 09-12-2016 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1743447)
That movie is to "Best of" comedies lists what Sgt. Pepper is to Rolling Stone lists: always at the top, and most likely because of fogey critic nostalgia, mindless elitism, and just being too scared to challenge convention.

You know what other movie is like that? Duck Soup. Not a laugh to be found.

JGuy Grungeman 09-12-2016 05:13 PM

Duck Soup was really funny. It's really just everyone of the Marx's personas that made it funny. Greatest ever? I wouldn't say so. But still great.

Janszoon 09-12-2016 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JGuy Grungeman (Post 1743470)
Duck Soup was really funny. It's really just everyone of the Marx's personas that made it funny. Greatest ever? I wouldn't say so. But still great.

For a really funny movie it's really not funny.

Exo 09-12-2016 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon (Post 1743450)
You know what other movie is like that? Duck Soup. Not a laugh to be found.

I'll agree with you on Some Like it Hot but you shut your goddamn whore mouth about Duck Soup.

Janszoon 09-12-2016 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exo (Post 1743481)
I'll agree with you on Some Like it Hot but you shut your goddamn whore mouth about Duck Soup.

It's easy to keep your mouth shut during a movie when it's as unfunny as Duck Soup.

Chula Vista 09-12-2016 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1743447)
That movie is to "Best of" comedies lists what Sgt. Pepper is to Rolling Stone lists: always at the top, and most likely because of fogey critic nostalgia, mindless elitism, and just being too scared to challenge convention.

Re: Sgt. Pepper's

You've never been so wrong. In all of the arts there are defining moments in their history where the game is forever changed. And those moments are in no way nostalgia. They are critical links in the chain of the art's history.

There was abstract painting before Picasso and then abstract painting after Picasso.
There was modern classical music before Varese and then modern classical after him.
There was horror writing before Lovecraft and then horror writing after him.
There was electric guitar before Hendrix and then electric guitar after him.
There was pop/rock albums before Pet Sounds and Sgt. Pepper and then...... you get the idea.

Has nothing to do with nostalgia. It has to do with critical turning points in the evolution of a particular art form.

To discount that stuff is just plain stupid.

Janszoon 09-12-2016 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chula Vista (Post 1743490)
There was abstract painting before Picasso and then abstract painting after Picasso.

Picasso wasn't an abstract artist.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:53 AM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.