Bro he's a braindead fascist. You're wasting your time trying to tell him things.

https://www.gifcen.com/wp-content/up...tler-gif-1.gif

Positive. Good. Dictator.

For some reason Norg, I get this strange creeping feeling that you're not well versed in modern history.

Yeah I know but you gotta try. Ryan Reynolds gif huh?

errr... I think he actually is a dictator lol

Norg 1
TH 0

No he's not. He may be SEEN as a dictator (and may be in all but name) but he's not "the Russian Dictator", he's the Russian President. Like it or not, he still has to follow Russian laws and policies. He can't write new laws without the Politburo etc etc basically yes he's a dictator as we see it but officially he is an elected (!) president.

In any case, the main thrust of my argument there (not that it did any good and even you cherry-picked the bit you could contradict me on and ignored the rest) is that Putin, dictator or not, does not want what's good for Russia. He couldn't give two ****s about Russia. He wants what's good for him and his ego.

Norg 1
TH 34,450

Do dictators usually call themselves The Official Dictator of [Country]? I think we need to give a point to Norg on this one.

Yeah, if Putin really had to answer to somebody, he would have already been out on a rail.

I think they should all give themselves titles like Idi Amin did so it's more obvious who is, in fact, a dictator:

"His Excellency, President for Life, Field Marshal Al Hajj Doctor Idi Amin Dada, VC, DSO, MC, Lord of all the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Sea and Conqueror of the British Empire in Africa in General and Uganda in Particular."

https://media.tenor.com/_RXvBoRx9xkA...amin-laugh.gif

He also declared himself King of England

I thought it was Scotland, per the Forest Whitaker movie?

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...cotland_uk.jpg

Nope, I read in the Newspaper.com archives somewhere that he had claimed to be the King of England, though I suppose Scotland would have been included in that in his mind.


BTW: Whitaker is brilliantly menacing as Idi Amin.

Ahhh...

and yes...love the movie

based

You gotta pick a country that can't argue with you. Austria-Hungary can't tell me I'm not the emperor.

Fair enough. Why not, after all?
https://media.tenor.com/nDE7rTAmLoYA...lph-wiggum.gif
If he didn't have to answer to anyone...
https://media.tenor.com/IoQ7DHPmEOAA...eird-horse.gif
I'd like to see that link. I know he styled himself King of Scotland but I don't think he ever claimed to be king of England.

My favourite joke about him was some comedian had him sitting at his desk, with a sign that says AMIN and when he reversed it it said AM OUT.

Kinda like north Korea calls themselves the democratic peoples republic of Korea? That must mean they are a democracy right....

Catch up. I've already ceded the point to Norg. It's the rest that's important anyway, which you have once again ignored. Not that I'm surprised.

You still argued back and said no he's not he's the president. Which is what I was responding to. You want a pat on the back for saying Putin is bad or something? Lol.

Please.

The funny thing is, it's a conservative county. If it's right wing terrorism, they're shooting themselves in the foot.

In land space I guess. We're certainly more conservative than like Denmark.

Jwb was dismissive of the idea of a trans genocide and who knows, man, but this does look like a potential step.

Texas sought gender change data on drivers licenses, report says

um to be fair in the same convo you flat out said Tim Pool and crowder types wouldn't entertain the talk of Jewish bankers etc on their platforms and that is precisely what went on to happen within like a weeks time.

What evidence is there linking the power grid thing to trans **** btw?

Um, transmitters? Transformers?

We were talking about degrees of rhetoric and while the last week has been wild neither has said anything like

"The Jews control the media.

People are calling for violence.

I don't think Congress is going to stop the control of the media.

People will not stop calling for violence.

You tell me what happens next."

As far as I know just a random tweet that was circulating that was taken as potentially claiming credit.

www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna60236

There wasn't a specific analog to that word for word tweet but crowder basically said Kanye isn't completely wrong about the Jews and many are basically doing the "well it's not all Jews but there is this nefarious left wing Jewish mob..." Point being you are being super pedantic in trying to pretend like the gulf in rhetoric between the two is so massive because of one ****ing Tim pool tweet that you seem to think is so above and beyond everything else that has happened apparently...

With Jews they're in the "just asking questions" phase. It's ****ed up but they're still not crossing the line of justifying anti-Jewish violence and afaik there isn't any modern history of anti-Jewish legislation or lawmaker rhetoric to go along with it.

Um that Tim pool tweet is also in the "just asking questions" phase. It's literally framed as a nefarious sounding open ended question. That's the only way you can do this ****. He would be taken off the air in a heartbeat if he dropped the pretense and just said he supports the violence.

There's also no Ye equivalent for the LGBT thing. Nobody who is as mask off about it with as prominent of a platform even post-cancellation. There's nothing quite like it that we've seen that I can think of.

That is not asking any questions as a dog whistle, it is thinly masking a prescriptive statement with descriptive language. It is almost actionable.

He's also an anomaly. As far as I know there hasn't been a single celebrity since WW2 who''s been willing to torpedo their career and reputation by publicly going mask off antisemite. The right as a whole is more openly anti-trans than they are antisemitic.

it's nonetheless couched in the plausible deniability of just asking questions. You are trying to split hairs to make it so this one tweet places the trans genocide on a different level and that is simply motivated reasoning on your part.


damn you have a**** memory. Even I remember Mel Gibson.

Either way I agree the Jews are largely treated way more sensitively cause of the Holocaust. But that only means that people are more likely to suppress and conceal antisemitism, not that it's less likely to crop up in a genocidal fashion. Part of the allure is the conspiratorial angle of the Jews controlling the media and everything else so the " you can't talk about this" vibe actually makes antisemitism more appealing, not less.

1. Plausible deniability yes but there is no open question about trans people. Trans and gay people ARE grooming children and people WILL kill them for it, the only "question" is what "happens next" if trans and gay people keep grooming children, which isn't a question but a veiled threat since the answer has already been given.

2. It's just dishonest to say I'm using one tweet to make my case. This current discussion started with me posting an article about Texas trying to find trans people through drivers licenses and I've already mentioned lawmaker rhetoric and legislation. We're both aware of the current grooming moral panic that is being trumpeted from MTG to Greg Abbott to DeSantis to Matt Walsh to chuds on the ground protesting drag shows to Facebook boomers screaming about trans people in women's sports.

And hey here's a story of a trans community alpaca ranch who have to do armed patrols of the property and put up a fence cause of threats and armed trespassers.

https://www.cpr.org/2021/05/07/in-cu...of-harassment/

I was well aware of Mel Gibson when posting. He never was willing after the story hit to go on camera and talk about the JQ. He went deep underground and hoped it would all go away and did not become a willing tool for right wing "question asking".

Kanye has brought antisemitism into the spotlight by virtue of how insane the spectacle is. Trans people merely have to exist and be visible for lawmakers to bandy about bathroom laws.

*movie trailer voiceover* a BRAIN WAR between two MB heavyweights

DEBATING

which group is gonna get genocided first, THE QUEERS or THE JEWS

TUNE IN etc

I believe Batty is talking about trans people, not queers. Which, in itself, is not a very flattering term to use for gay people. Isn't that a slur? Unless you're one of them yourself of course. Like using the N word when you're not black?

Oh look, the guy who can't get Foucault's Boomerang right.

It's long been reclaimed and is now one of the preferred umbrella terms of choice for LGBTQ+ people. We even have Queer Theory in universities https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queer_theory

I like that it used to mean "oblique" (before acquiring the sexual undertones sometime in the 20th century). It's used in the first story in Joyce's Dubliners, Sisters, and there the denotation is still "strange, not quite right" but the sexual connotation is very much there (it's about an elderly priest and a young boy, do the math...).


Foucault's Boomerang is not a thing, it's the mother of all "taken out of context". Foucault gives a nod to a theory that was around long ago in a lecture course where he develops ideas that couldn't be further from that.

It comes from some blog, where the guy randomly pulls this short paragraph to co-sign Foucault onto a set of propositions Foucault's would've rolled his eyes at. I want to say "this would've never passed peer review" but I've seen stuff on this level get published by Anglo sociologists and esp in the so-called "security studies". You latch onto the one paragraph you are comfortable with and ignore the rest.

Bro. I had my entire reponse types out on my ****ty ass phone and somehow pressed back and couldn't get it back. I had to bring out the laptop I'm so pissed. I would say the "questions" surrounding the JQ are similarly not real questions, and the answer to the so-called JQ has long since been solved. The questions serve not to open a genuine line of inquiry, but to paint the Jews as a nefarious and often almost other-worldly threat. I really don't see much of a functional difference between this and what Tim Pool is doing in that tweet.

It seems like the Tim Pool tweet is the main metric you use to dismiss the overall climate of anti-semitic rhetoric as just being in the phase of "just
asking questions," since there is no analog to that tweet for other groups. That is your common refrain in this discussion from my pov.

The ID thing i didn't comment on because i haven't looked into it but on the face of it, it sounds like one of those culture war type issues like the bathrooms thing or the trans sports ****. Although I understand how it sounds draconian and you could easily suppose a scenario where that's the first step to rounding people up, I don't believe that's what they're actually after.

I do think they want to make it less acceptable socially. Ultimately that's what all of this is about, in my opinion.


That's fair. That was a bad comparison. I'll take that L.

But even so I think that Kanye represents a threat, and sometimes threats come in anomalies, like Trump. But even beyond that, guys like Nick Fuentes are even more worrying looking forwards. I was watching his debate with AJ and they played a video in between of Fuentes ranting about the Jews that was like a straight up Hitler speech. I can't find the video on youtube but here's the quote from Fuentes:

"When it comes to the Jews, here's the silver lining. It tends to go from 0 to 60. Like, they're not wrong about that. But there's a reason for that. And the reason is them, ok? When it comes to the Jews, every society where **** has gone down with these people, it always goes from 0 to 60. It never starts with burning all the Talmuds in Paris, OK? [laughs] It never starts that way. But frequently, it seems to end that way, and it gets there very rapidly. Doesn't start there but it frequently ends there. But I would say the Jews had better start being nice to people like us. Because what comes out of this is going to be a lot worse and a lot uglier than anything that has been said on this show or will be said on this show."

Ehh no. Ye brought it back into the limelight for sure but people were marching in Charlottesville in 2017 chanting "Jews will not replace us." Richard Spencer is no longer relevant but the Jew hatred did survive to the next generation of the dissident right, and it lines up pretty neatly with a lot of the QAnon christian nationalism type vibe of the modern right.

lol

to be clear, my original point was that while trans and lgbt people get targeted in certain ways I don't think they're on the verge of genocide, and in addition to that I thought there are other groups we can make similar arguments about using pretty much the same metrics. I don't think the Jews are on the verge of a genocide either though.