Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/)
-   -   What Did President Trump Do Now? (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/87986-what-did-president-trump-do-now.html)

duga 04-11-2017 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elphenor (Post 1822346)
Actually I've been looking at historians and political scientists who predicted the victory and they say it had nothing to do with Trump or Hillary and everything to do with the classic question

"are you better off now than you were 4 years ago"

So yeah maybe blame Obama's limp wristed neoliberalism go figure

I think it's a bit more nuanced than that. To a conservative, the answer would almost assuredly be "no", just like the answer was "no" for liberals at the end of Bush's administration. This time around for liberals, the answer was "meh, wasn't too bad". That, combined with the incredible lack of excitement for Hillary and the very intense "no" coming from the right pretty much ensured a republican victory. I was worried about this the whole time, but held out hope that people could see just how bad Trump would be that they wouldn't elect him.

This has been how our country operates every cycle and why we've more or less taken turns in who has the power every 4-8 years. It's just that this time we really couldn't afford to "take turns". Alas, the left gets wayy too complacent.

Chula Vista 04-11-2017 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elphenor (Post 1822346)

"are you better off now than you were 4 years ago"

Weird thing is, I was. The value of my home and my 401K were both way up. Finance rates were ridiculoulsy low as were gas prices. Other than BENGHAZI!!!!!! things were "relatively" quiet on the world stage, and The Backstreet Boys had reformed and started touring again.

Salad days man.

Salad days.

Justthefacts 04-11-2017 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chula Vista (Post 1822228)
Ok, lame. But still kinda funny and spot on.

https://scontent.fsan1-2.fna.fbcdn.n...eb&oe=594F96C2

The one thing I really kinda despise is the cronyism clearly happening before our eyes. Case in point, Jared fucking Kushner. Fuck that guy.

Chula Vista 04-11-2017 01:21 PM

Total silver spoon dude. Oh, and his uber-rich dad?

Quote:

In the summer of 2004, Kushner was fined $508,900 by the Federal Election Commission for contributing to political campaigns in the names of his partnerships when he lacked authorization to do so.

In 2005, following an investigation by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of New Jersey, U.S. Attorney Chris Christie negotiated a plea agreement with Kushner, under which he pleaded guilty to 18 counts of illegal campaign contributions, tax evasion, and witness tampering. The witness-tampering charge arose from Kushner's act of retaliation against William Schulder, his sister Esther's husband, who was cooperating with federal investigators.

Kushner hired a prostitute to seduce his brother-in-law, arranged to record an encounter between the two, and had the tape sent to his sister. Kushner was sentenced to two years in prison and served 14 months at Federal Prison Camp, Montgomery in Alabama before being sent to a halfway house in Newark, New Jersey to complete his sentence. He was released from prison on August 25, 2006.

As a result of his convictions, Kushner was disbarred from practicing law in New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania.

Chula Vista 04-11-2017 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elphenor (Post 1822362)
This is the sort of cocoon Democrats wrapped themselves in while Flint drank poison water and what used to be the middle class was shooting up heroin

BS. Don't lump me in with the Dems who are on autopilot. I'm fully engaged and informed.

The Batlord 04-11-2017 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chula Vista (Post 1822370)
BS. Don't lump me in with the Dems who are on autopilot. I'm fully engaged and informed.

Beyond what directly affects you and what Donald Trump had for breakfast today?

Chula Vista 04-11-2017 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1822371)
Beyond what directly affects you.

Please. I've expounded on my political, personal, ideological, and philisophical views here a number of times. Again, stop trying to lump me in with some sort of autopilot norm.

Anteater 04-11-2017 01:30 PM

Complacency is definitely part of it, but is it any surprise so many voted for Trump secretly when people along these lines predominate a big chunk of the media?

http://i63.tinypic.com/s1jbxy.jpg

The Batlord 04-11-2017 01:34 PM

I think the media are really made up more of boring, upper middle class, white people in ugly suits who no one listens to in the first place.

Frownland 04-11-2017 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chula Vista (Post 1822370)
BS. Don't lump me in with the Dems who are on autopilot. I'm fully engaged and informed.

*giggles*

Trollheart 04-11-2017 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chula Vista (Post 1822228)
Ok, lame. But still kinda funny and spot on.

https://scontent.fsan1-2.fna.fbcdn.n...eb&oe=594F96C2

I'd have two problems with that picture. One, "Porn, probably". Huh? You might as well point an arrow at Trump and say "child molester/rapist, probably" with regard to his daughter. But there's no proof. It could just as easily be a graph or a movie or a defaced picture of Hillary or ****ing anything on the screen. That takes ultra-lame to new lows. Also, why is Trump labelled as "failed steak tycoon" when, love him or hate him, he is obviously a very successful real estate tycoon?

The Batlord 04-11-2017 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1822399)
I'd have two problems with that picture. One, "Porn, probably". Huh? You might as well point an arrow at Trump and say "child molester/rapist, probably" with regard to his daughter. But there's no proof. It could just as easily be a graph or a movie or a defaced picture of Hillary or ****ing anything on the screen. That takes ultra-lame to new lows. Also, why is Trump labelled as "failed steak tycoon" when, love him or hate him, he is obviously a very successful real estate tycoon?

Because he had a steak business that failed.

duga 04-11-2017 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elphenor (Post 1822401)
This hasn't always been the case there have been times where one party dominated

See: FDR being elected to FOUR terms

In recent history American politics has comprised of conservatives and conservative-lites so nothing is ever being done for the majority of voters and so they just look at their life and go "yup still ****" and protest vote the other party in

Of course it's not an exact science. Although, I will say FDR is an unfair comparison - he got us out of the Depression AND a world war. People were pretty happy with the way he did things.

Trollheart 04-11-2017 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1822404)
Because he had a steak business that failed.

Yeah but it ignores the fact that his other businesses were successful. It's just annoying. You can fail at this but be wildly successful at that. Do people then remember you for when you failed at this or when you made it at that?

The Batlord 04-11-2017 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1822429)
Yeah but it ignores the fact that his other businesses were successful. It's just annoying. You can fail at this but be wildly successful at that. Do people then remember you for when you failed at this or when you made it at that?

it's a meme that references another guy financing the lego batman movie. stfu

Frownland 04-11-2017 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1822429)
Yeah but it ignores the fact that his other businesses were successful. It's just annoying. You can fail at this but be wildly successful at that. Do people then remember you for when you failed at this or when you made it at that?

Bitter partisan political memes are rarely thesis-level social commentary.

I would've given Chula **** for it but he acknowledged that it's lame so he gets a pass on this one.

Trollheart 04-11-2017 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1822433)
it's a meme that references another guy financing the lego batman movie. stfu

You stfu

Neapolitan 04-11-2017 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duga (Post 1822405)
Of course it's not an exact science. Although, I will say FDR is an unfair comparison -he got us out of the Depression AND a world war. People were pretty happy with the way he did things.

If it took a person twelve years to save someone drowning in quicksand would you consider that an achievement too?

"FDR got us out of ... a world war." He died more than three weeks before Germany's surrender. So why exactly are you bestowing FDR with this posthumous achievement award?

Trollheart 04-11-2017 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neapolitan (Post 1822461)
If it took a person twelve years to save someone drowning in quicksand would you consider that an achievement too?

"FDR got us out of ... a world war." He died more than three weeks before Germany's surrender. So why exactly are you bestowing FDR with this posthumous achievement award?

I'm assuming he's saying FDR helped the US win the war, which really is something you can't deny, though it was Truman who dropped the bomb.

The Batlord 04-11-2017 06:10 PM

And let's not forget that Republican president Herbert Hoover did not get us out of the Great Depression. But that's potentially meaningless just as tiger-repellant rocks are not proof of repelling tigers.

Neapolitan 04-11-2017 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1822481)
I'm assuming he's saying FDR helped the US win the war, which really is something you can't deny, though it was Truman who dropped the bomb.

He didn't say "win," he clearly said "got us out of ..."

"FDR helped the US win the war" - The Allies and the resistance and British spies helped the US armed forces to win the war. It wasn't FDR alone.

The Batlord 04-11-2017 06:33 PM

When he has nothing to say he switches to pedantic trolling without even realizing it.

Neapolitan 04-11-2017 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1822498)
And let's not forget that Republican president Herbert Hoover did not get us out of the Great Depression. But that's potentially meaningless just as tiger-repellant rocks are not proof of repelling tigers.

You need a sling before they truly become tiger-repellant rocks.

Lucem Ferre 04-11-2017 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elphenor (Post 1822469)
wow more than 3 weeks you're right he had nothing to do with it

Lol, people don't realize that a lot of effects from changes, especially economic ones, aren't instantaneous. These are the type of people that think the rising jobs on Trump's first day was all Trump and had nothing to do with Obama.

Trollheart 04-12-2017 05:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neapolitan (Post 1822500)
He didn't say "win," he clearly said "got us out of ..."

"FDR helped the US win the war" - The Allies and the resistance and British spies helped the US armed forces to win the war. It wasn't FDR alone.

You and your damn pedantics. Though I can't get into his head, I'm assuming this is what he meant: to get someone out of something would be to achieve the end of it, which is what happened. He got the US out of the war by helping win it, otherwise they might have been in it (including a costly invasion of Japan) and by authorising the development of the atomic bomb, which was the main factor in ending at least the war in the Pacific.

Are you really going to be such a dick as to deny FDR his legacy? Have you nothing else to do?
:rolleyes:

duga 04-12-2017 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neapolitan (Post 1822500)
He didn't say "win," he clearly said "got us out of ..."

"FDR helped the US win the war" - The Allies and the resistance and British spies helped the US armed forces to win the war. It wasn't FDR alone.

Wow. If these are the kinds of mental gymnastics you have to do to make your point, maybe you should rethink your position.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1822583)
You and your damn pedantics. Though I can't get into his head, I'm assuming this is what he meant: to get someone out of something would be to achieve the end of it, which is what happened. He got the US out of the war by helping win it, otherwise they might have been in it (including a costly invasion of Japan) and by authorising the development of the atomic bomb, which was the main factor in ending at least the war in the Pacific.

Are you really going to be such a dick as to deny FDR his legacy? Have you nothing else to do?
:rolleyes:

Thanks. I was tempted to respond with more detail, but what's the point? I'm sure every reasonable person who read my post understands what I meant.

Anteater 04-12-2017 08:24 AM

Honestly, FDR was one of the best presidents we ever had. Though his daughter Anna deserves a lot of credit too.

Ol’ Qwerty Bastard 04-12-2017 09:22 AM

i know very little about US presidents but JFK wins because that dude mastered the art of giving speeches.



>>>

Frownland 04-12-2017 09:29 AM

It's all about Teddy Roosevelt and Grover Cleveland.

duga 04-12-2017 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qwertyy (Post 1822615)
i know very little about US presidents but JFK wins because that dude mastered the art of giving speeches.

>>>

I agree with you on his speeches. However, JFK had the potential to be one of the greatest. I completely agree with his philosophy and as his presidency continued, he clearly had his eyes opened as to the problems with our current government and the solutions. Unfortunately, he did not live long enough to see many of those solutions enacted.

I always think about what would have happened and where we would be if JFK had lived and had 2 terms.

Ol’ Qwerty Bastard 04-12-2017 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1822617)
It's all about Teddy Roosevelt and Grover Cleveland.

the garbage can guy from sesame street?

Frownland 04-12-2017 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qwertyy (Post 1822619)
the garbage can guy from sesame street?

Nah the president who was like "oh this Benjamin Harrison guy, I can take him." Then everyone voted for Harrison in an upset and it sucked. That was when Cleveland came back and was like "miss me bitches? I told you it would be bad" for his acceptance speech before putting on sunglasses and walking away as the podium explodes behind him.

Grover Cleveland is a boss.

Frownland 04-12-2017 11:27 AM

Let's be honest though, those words got watered down and used too aggressively real fast.

grindy 04-12-2017 11:39 AM

What's that H with an arrow on that pic?

Frownland 04-12-2017 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grindy (Post 1822645)
What's that H with an arrow on that pic?

Hillary Clinton's campaign logo.

grindy 04-12-2017 12:33 PM

Thx.

Trollheart 04-12-2017 01:03 PM

Is it funny that the arrow is pointing to the right?

grindy 04-12-2017 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1822669)
Is it funny that the arrow is pointing to the right?

No. It's logical.

Frownland 04-12-2017 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1822669)
Is it funny that the arrow is pointing to the right?

If political campaigns are anything like the movies, then it was a wise choice.

Left or Right? Why a Character's Lateral Movement On-Screen Matters in Film

grindy 04-12-2017 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1822672)
If political campaigns are anything like the movies, then it was a wise choice.

Left or Right? Why a Character's Lateral Movement On-Screen Matters in Film

I think it's even simpler. Movement from left to right is perceived as movement forward, most likely due to our direction of writing.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:27 AM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.