Unpopular Music Opinions - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-06-2014, 07:23 PM   #9461 (permalink)
carpe musicam
 
Neapolitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
So KISS' simplicity can't have any merits?
Simplicity or complexity of song structure isn't the same as the ability to play instruments. Just to note, I didn't bring up Kiss' simplicity, that was neardeathexperience in another thread. I added to what Soulflower said that they were a gimmicky band and said they weren't all that good playing, which Gene said himself he didn't care that they weren't.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mord View Post
Actually, I like you a lot, Nea. That's why I treat you like ****. It's the MB way.

"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº?
“I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac.
“If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle.
"If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon
"I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards

Last edited by Neapolitan; 10-06-2014 at 07:31 PM.
Neapolitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2014, 07:32 PM   #9462 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,216
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neapolitan View Post
Simplicity or complexity of song structure isn't the same as the ability to play their instruments. Just to note, I didn't bring up Kiss' simplicity. I added to what Soulflower said that they were a gimmicky band and said they were all that good playing, which Gene said himself he didn't care that they weren't.
So? Musicianship is a means to an end, not an end in itself. If you can accomplish musically what you want without knowing one end of a guitar from the other then greater musicianship is like having a Harvard degree when your dream is to be an electrician. And music is an artform just like anything else, which means that it is only creatively bound by restrictions of preconceived notions. There's no reason why showmanship that doesn't have anything to do with the music itself can't factor in to an artist's worth. I'm not the biggest KISS fan, but the notion that they are less of a band just because they aren't particularly good musicians or they use visual gimmicks is nonsense. I'd certainly say that their schtick is like a poor man's Alice Cooper, but then I'm judging them on their own terms, and not by criteria that they are clearly not concerned with.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2014, 07:57 PM   #9463 (permalink)
Divination
 
Necromancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,655
Default

The 1983 album Lick It Up by KISS featuring Vinnie Vincent on guitar had two or three decent songs.
Necromancer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2014, 08:11 PM   #9464 (permalink)
Born to be mild
 
Trollheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,970
Default

"Creatures of the night" is a great album, and I grew up on "Kiss Alive" and "Kiss Alive II", as well as "Double Platinum", to say nothing of "Destroyer" and "Love gun". Hell, I even liked "Music from the Elder" a bit...
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018
Trollheart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2014, 08:14 PM   #9465 (permalink)
Divination
 
Necromancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,655
Default

Their live albums basically set the recording blueprint for most all other live rock albums after.
Necromancer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2014, 09:27 PM   #9466 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Ninetales's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: livin wild
Posts: 2,179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Forward To Death View Post
More purchases is more listens, more listens is more chances to make an impact or influence someone who might aspire to become a musician. It also makes your record company more money, which is about the most tangible impact that I can think of.
Who's had more impact, a band that's had massive success commercially or a band that influences them, but sold much less?
Ninetales is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2014, 10:30 PM   #9467 (permalink)
carpe musicam
 
Neapolitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
So? Musicianship is a means to an end, not an end in itself. If you can accomplish musically what you want without knowing one end of a guitar from the other then greater musicianship is like having a Harvard degree when your dream is to be an electrician. And music is an artform just like anything else, which means that it is only creatively bound by restrictions of preconceived notions. There's no reason why showmanship that doesn't have anything to do with the music itself can't factor in to an artist's worth. I'm not the biggest KISS fan, but the notion that they are less of a band just because they aren't particularly good musicians or they use visual gimmicks is nonsense. I'd certainly say that their schtick is like a poor man's Alice Cooper, but then I'm judging them on their own terms, and not by criteria that they are clearly not concerned with.
I noted Soulflower's statement that they were a gimmicky band and added something Gene Simmon said himself. He admits that efforts went into having a band that put on a ("gimmicky") stage show, his interest lie in the entertainment aspect of it and playing the right note didn't matter to him. Even you think of their schtick as "a poor man's Alice Cooper."

I didn't say anything that people haven't said already about the band. And I'm sure other people had said worse about other bands.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mord View Post
Actually, I like you a lot, Nea. That's why I treat you like ****. It's the MB way.

"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº?
“I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac.
“If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle.
"If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon
"I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards
Neapolitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2014, 02:52 AM   #9468 (permalink)
Trolier Than Thou
 
Forward To Death's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,336
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ninetales View Post
Who's had more impact, a band that's had massive success commercially or a band that influences them, but sold much less?
I thought I already answered this, but basically having more listeners means that more people are influenced by you, whether it's in taste, taking up music as a hobby, or as a profession.

Another thing to keep in mind, and this goes back to the point I made about making more money for your record label, is that the more you produce for your company, and the more popular you become, the more likely it is that your style is going to be emulated. Your label is more likely to invest in up-and-comers who are influenced by your style.
Forward To Death is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2014, 01:00 PM   #9469 (permalink)
Born to be mild
 
Trollheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,970
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
My unpopular opinion: the only redeemable part of Wish You Were Here is the keyboard solo on Welcome to the Machine. The rest is boring.
Sacrilege! I'm not having that! Every second on WYWH is gold, from the opening low keyboard to the moment the final notes fade away into the distance, making you wish there was more. From start to finish, there's not an ounce of fat nor any wasted space on that album. Possibly Floyd's finest.
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018
Trollheart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2014, 01:04 PM   #9470 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,548
Default

♫Shine on you standard and boring chord progression♫

No thanks.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.