Ramones vs. The Clash

tgpo · 09-29-2009, 12:43 PM

I don't like all three, so what's the forth option?

Urban Hat€monger ? · 09-29-2009, 12:59 PM

Go post in another thread instead

jacklovezhimself · 09-29-2009, 02:54 PM

^^ I second this.

The Monkey · 09-29-2009, 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DetroitMike

Definitley the Ramones...if it weren't for them, The Clash would likely have been brit pop anyhow!

You mean without The Ramones The Clash wouldn't have begun recording music until the mid-90s? How did you reach that conclusion?

Punk · 10-04-2009, 12:51 PM

The Ramones were first. Clash and Pistols idolized them. But, when the Pistols came out they blew away the Clash and the Ramones... they were top dog but were only around for a short time

Classof75 · 10-05-2009, 11:46 AM

I like Joe Strummer's solo album "Street Core" better than anything punk. Check it out.

The Monkey · 10-07-2009, 01:37 PM

I don't know if it's because of this thread, but a few nights ago I dreamt that me and some friends got into a fight with a gang because they preferred Ramones over The Clash. Certainly as good a reason to fight as any, n'est-ce pas?

storymilo · 10-07-2009, 05:02 PM

I still can't believe that there are three people who have never even listened to either of those bands.

Pixi · 10-08-2009, 11:55 AM

Well the Ramones are wayyy more punk than the Clash. The Clash is really good but they really only had a few punk songs. They were kind of like the gateway to alternative punk music. I think that both are equally as good though.

dragonjosef · 10-11-2009, 11:53 AM

oh man, umm
clash is a better band
but the ramones have funner, 50's rock style songs

View Poll Results: Who was better?
The Ramones	64,000	99.81%
The Clash	121	0.19%
The Sex Pistols suck (aka, never listened to either)	3	0.00%
Voters: 64124. You may not vote on this poll

09-29-2009, 12:43 PM	#231 (permalink)
tgpo Music Addict Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 207	I don't like all three, so what's the forth option? __________________ tgpo.org \| Last.fm

09-29-2009, 12:59 PM	#232 (permalink)
Urban Hat€monger ? The Sexual Intellectual Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Somewhere cooler than you Posts: 18,626	Go post in another thread instead __________________ Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.

09-29-2009, 02:54 PM	#233 (permalink)
jacklovezhimself five years Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Chicago Posts: 1,248	^^ I second this. __________________

10-04-2009, 12:51 PM	#235 (permalink)
Punk Groupie Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: USA Posts: 10	The Ramones were first. Clash and Pistols idolized them. But, when the Pistols came out they blew away the Clash and the Ramones... they were top dog but were only around for a short time

10-05-2009, 11:46 AM	#236 (permalink)
Classof75 Music Addict Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 127	I like Joe Strummer's solo album "Street Core" better than anything punk. Check it out.

10-07-2009, 01:37 PM	#237 (permalink)
The Monkey Music Addict Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Sweden Posts: 803	I don't know if it's because of this thread, but a few nights ago I dreamt that me and some friends got into a fight with a gang because they preferred Ramones over The Clash. Certainly as good a reason to fight as any, n'est-ce pas?

10-07-2009, 05:02 PM	#238 (permalink)
storymilo Music Addict Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 1,845	I still can't believe that there are three people who have never even listened to either of those bands.

10-08-2009, 11:55 AM	#239 (permalink)
Pixi Groupie Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 4	Well the Ramones are wayyy more punk than the Clash. The Clash is really good but they really only had a few punk songs. They were kind of like the gateway to alternative punk music. I think that both are equally as good though.

10-11-2009, 11:53 AM	#240 (permalink)
dragonjosef Groupie Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 2	oh man, umm clash is a better band but the ramones have funner, 50's rock style songs