Lol

Business Insider - Neo-Nazi Richard Spencer: "I plan to vote for Joe Biden in November."

OMG it's basically diet Trump at this point.

Counter-protestors or agitators, perhaps self-identified as “libertarian” who are white, shoot 3 protesters killing two of them. It doesn’t look like they know who the shooter(s) are.

Two killed, one injured in shooting during third night of unrest in Kenosha

This should all be great for Trump's campaign ads.

Looks like Galveston is about to get demolished.

Galveston should be renamed "Hurricane Bitch".

The AP

There are a few different angles on YouTube.

Pelosi says there shouldn't be any debates between Biden and Trump

Uh-oh. The Dems are getting scared. Must be because Trump is starting to push for drug tests before the debates.

What is it mayweather pacquiao?

Nah, Trump is suggesting that the reason that Biden did much better in his last primary debate was some kind of drug that he's taking. I think Trump is on drugs too - but because he knows the Dems will completely balk at the idea of a drug test before the debates (if there even are debates), it's an easy optics victory for him.

It seems like Trump would want to debate.

I watched some of the RNC. SMGDH.

180,000 deaths and it’s Trump beat covid!!!

What gives you the idea that he doesn't want to debate?

Of course that's how they'll frame it - that's politics. I've only been watching the highlights though and I haven't seen the RNC speakers talk about Covid at all. Just like the DNC speakers I saw didn't talk about the riots.

Sounds like the drug test thing is a stall.

I highly doubt it. Like I said, I think he knows they won't agree to do it - but he's not saying that it's a requirement for him to debate. He just wants them to publicly refuse to do it so he can get a cheap optics victory and (as unlikely as it might seem) if Biden actually does really well in the debates, Trump can claim that it's because he's taking some kind of drug and on those grounds, it was an unfair debate (typical Trump whining)

Yeah

It bothers me that taking mental health medicine would matter but that’s neither here nor there.

He’s making a list
He’s checking it twice

Sounds a lot like Nixon's "enemies" list.

I'll give 'em points for honesty. Previous administrations made lists and compiled dossiers and went after journalists and didn't say a damn thing in advance. :laughing:

https://www.newsweek.com/cloudflare-...utages-1528601

All my favorite streaming sites are down and the ones that don't use cloudflare suck dick.

It's back up now I can finally continue my Sopranos.

Thai king frees jailed concubine to join ‘sex soldier’ harem amid pandemic :pimp:

This streaking black man who they’re saying was dusted had a spit hood put over his head after he was handcuffed. Then the pigs go full Ted Bundy on him. He died from being suffocated after he was already restrained.

-AP

Happened back in March. I'm sure his family, releasing the bodycam footage now, has only the purest of intentions. To prove it, they've started a Gofundme page and have collected over $10,000 within 24 hrs.

https://www.gofundme.com/f/justice-for-daniel-prude

And he was dressed like a slut too, right?

And how pure are your intentions for pointing this out?

I'm rather cynical, so probably about as pure as a moderately diluted whiskey.

Same deal for me asking you that question, so fair game.

Idk

Before we call it square maybe SGR should get to watch a family member get murdered on video to make sure he has a pure perspective.

SGR - you need help. That’s not cynicism. That’s just cruelty on your part. Cynicism is how you would feel if it was your loved one murdered by the state.

Really I’d be banned if I said what you deserve to hear.

Is it really necessary to bring my family into this in some sort of twisted appeal to emotion?

If you believe that the family of victims of police violence/brutality/negligence always have unassailable intentions, that's fine. I don't.

I don't think bringing up the possibility of doubt when it comes to their intentions is "cruelty" - insensitive? Probably. But cruelty is a little hyperbolic.

I will grant you that casting doubt on their intentions is premature. We don't yet know when they received the bodycam footage. If they received the bodycam footage recently, I'll retract all casting of doubt.

I give you the benefit of the doubt, but casting such a doubt as the purity of the intentions of the source of the video drives the conversation away from the fact that somebody died.

I appreciate that. As I said, my casting of doubt was entirely premature, and as you noted, tangential.

The implication of my doubt-casting was that they were doing this to make money - in all likelihood, this money is going to be used to pay the legal fees to take the state/officers to court.

Yes. There’s a straightforward video of a man being murdered and you **** talk his family. So yes. Take some time to visualize your family member getting murdered on film and try to get to the core of how that would make you feel. Because that’s what happened to these people. So yes, since you can’t get that, dig ****ing deeper.

I wonder if SGR would give Tucker Carlson the benefit of the doubt if he'd said it.

Pascha: One of Europe's biggest brothels goes bust :pimp:

Tits up?