Trying to equate the Huff Post with Breitbart? Again, check your sleeve dude.

Making up news. Biased news.

One of these things is not like the other.

I would say hardly subtle. I never said racism was his driving force either. But it certainly helped along with his driving force of fear mongering to the people less fortunate to know better. His racism was just a cherry on top of the cake that had been made by his hatred and bigotry throughout his campaign.

They're about the same.

They're both disingenuous opinion oriented outlets with laughable agendas and ranking up there in Google search with all the biggest mainstream outlets. They're the funhouse mirror counterparts to CNN and Fox. :rofl:

I...actually agree with both of these.

I don't. Not at all.

*cough* Pulitzer Prize for journalism *cough*

Frownland responds with his typical, "awards don't mean credibility" BS in 5... 4... 3... 2...

Ant responds with something along the lines of "the Pulitzer's are liberal leaning".....


And YES. Let's talk about the whole Flynn thing. This is freaking HUGE.

Chula buys into the bs instead of adding anything to the conversation like "I disgaree and here's why:"... :D

HuffPost caters to liberal propaganda. No doubt about that.

:finger::finger:

The HP does not get involved with propaganda. They just report the facts from a liberal standpoint. They are miles above MSNBC, Fox, and Breitbart in actual credibility.

I don't even need to talk about the Pulitzer Prize. Go read some of those HuffPost headlines - they make Fox News look like C-SPAN.

I'll be following the Flynn Fallout with great interest.